Saturday, July 11, 2009

CIT v Rameshwar Dass Suresh Pal Cheeka (P & H) (08/12/2006)

Income Tax Act, 1961, s. 68 – Held, referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court on thisissue in Girdhari Lal Nannelal vs. Sales Tax Commissioner - Where a credit entry in respectof Rs.10,000/- stands in the name of the wife of the partner, no presumption arises that thesaid amount represents the income of the firm and not of the partner or his wife - The fact that neither the assessee firm nor its partner or his wife adduced satisfactory material to show the source of that money would not lead to the inference that the said sum represents theincome of firm accruing from undisclosed sale transactions – Petition Disposed Of.

This is mine google SMS channel through this you will receive direct updates in mobile

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/ca_taxmannindia

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

whos.amung.us

  © Blogger template The Business Templates by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP